Home » Public Administration » EFFECTS OF LEGISLATIVE-EXECUTIVE CONFLICTS ON DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AT THE GRASS...
EFFECTS OF LEGISLATIVE-EXECUTIVE CONFLICTS ON DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AT THE GRASSROOT IN NIGERIA
Sold By: Joe Project Store | Item Type: Project Material | Report this? | Attributes: 50 pages | 1-5 chapters | Amount: ₦5,000 | Marked useful: 5,276 times
Delivery: Within 24 hoursABSTRACT
The rudiments of a true democracy are good governance, fair and legitimate elections, justice, equity, accountability, transparency, responsible leadership, political education of the masses, respect for the rule of law and importantly corporation among the different branches of government. Regrettably, the practice of the so-called democracy in the 21st Century Nigeria is intrinsically characterized by legislative cum executive conflicts (Obidimma & Obidimma, 2015). This study appraised the effects of legislative-executive conflicts on democratic governance in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic with some special references to Lagos State. Descriptive Survey Design was adopted in the study. A total of ninety three (93) copies of questionnaire were administered to respondents during the field survey, while ninety (90) were properly filled and returned to the researcher. Data analysis was undertaken using simple percentage and frequency distribution tables. Spearman’s Rank Correlations was used to test all the stated hypotheses with the aid of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 20.0). The objectives of the study were to evaluate the cause and effect factors underlying democratic governance in Nigeria’s fourth republic; vis-à-vis legislative-executive feud, conflicts and face off. The data analysis and test of the stated hypothesis revealed thatthere is a significant relationship between legislative-executive conflicts and democratic governance in Nigeria’s fourth republic. The study also showed thatlegislative-executive conflicts is a significant predictor of the political stability in Lagos State, service delivery as well as the budgeting process. Both the executive and legislature should respect and strictly adhere to the tenets of the principles of separation of powers. They should also try to collaborate in necessary areas that would promote good governance and democracy in the Fourth Republic.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
A true democracy is a sine qua non for the development of all sectors of any country’s economy. However, democracy incorporates the exploitative and allienative tendencies often demonstrated by the capitalists against the downtrodden. Democracy, from an empirical view point could mean “a socioeconomic and political formation that grants the hoi polloi (common people) the irreducible instrument of determining and participating effectively in the day-to-day smooth governance of their country”. That is, the general transformative and re-structuring powers of that state are vested in the hands of the electorates (Golden, 2010).
The rudiments of a true democracy are good governance, fair and legitimate elections, justice, equity, accountability, transparency, responsible leadership, political education of the masses, respect for the rule of law and importantly corporation among the different branches of government. Regrettably, the practice of the so-called democracy in the 21st Century Nigeria is intrinsically characterized by legislative cum executive conflicts (Obidimma & Obidimma, 2015).
One of the major factors threatening Nigeria’s democracy in the current fourth republic is conflict between the executive and legislative arms of government. Contemporary development at the federal, state and local government levels proved that the relationship between the legislature and executive branch is not harmonious. Success and failure of government, as well as governmental policies, programmes and projects are all considered in many quarters as consequences of the nature of relationship existing between the executive and legislature (Bassey, Raphael & Omono, 2013).
During the days of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, there were several attempts to muzzle the legislature. But the attempt to assert the independence of the legislature, considering its constitutional role in the political arrangement, invariably brought it on collision with the executive. This led to frequent frictions between the two arms of government. The protracted face-off took a life of notoriety with the removal of three Senate Presidents in three years. In the circumstances that led to the removal of Senators Evan(s) Enwerem, Chuba Okadigbo or Adolphus Wabara, as senate presidents, the connivance, collusion or involvement of the executive arm of government was always alleged. Most National Assembly watchers at the time saw the Presidency as the unseen hand behind the crisis of confidence that almost wrecked the Senate (Eme & Ogbochie, 2014).
It is important to note that, the legislature performs the all-important function of law-making, one of three limbs of the doctrine of separation of powers. And without doubt, legislation is the most far-reaching and crucial power of the government of a society. As succinctly put by a most learned constitutional scholar, legislative power is the “distinctive mark of a country’s sovereignty, and the index of its status as an independent state” (Nwabueze, 2003). The executive on the other hand, performs the function inter alia of execution and maintenance of the laws made by the legislature. Laws validly made by the legislature are the predominant source of executive powers, and without such laws, the executive function cannot be performed (Obidimma & Obidimma, 2015).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
There is the popular belief that the business of government usually suffers whenever the relationship between the executive and the legislature is strained. The constant conflict between the two critical organs of government usually affects the effectiveness of the government in its bid to deliver the dividends of democracy to the electorate. Besides, the constant face-off between the executive and legislature could put the nation’s democracy in danger, if not properly tackled (Eme & Ogbochie, 2014).
The nature of legislature-executive relations in the current fourth republic in Nigeria has over the years, attracted wide variety of viewpoints both about conflict and cooperation, whether one or the other dominates, and whether benefits or liabilities result from either. While some see legislature-executive conflict as a necessary and beneficial precondition to limiting and controlling government (Madison, 1992; Oji, Nwachukwu, & Eme, 2014), others view it as contributing to gridlock over major public policy decisions, thus making democratic governance ineffective (King, 1976; Kopecky, 2004).
The relationship between the legislature and the executive in Nigeria has been characterized by mutual suspicion, acrimony and political rivalry (Nwannekanma & Ogbodo, 2010). Despite the unequivocal provisions of the 1999 Constitution aimed at rectifying the problems identified with legislature-executive relations in the preceding republics, managing executive-legislature relations has been the single most problematic issue both at the centre and the state level since the beginning of the fourth republic.
The principle of separation of powers is one unique feature of presidential democracy. At the same time, the branches are expected to serve as checks on each other as a preventive measure against absolute or abuse of power. Consequently, Nigeria leaders, when adopting the presidential system in 1979, had envisaged a strengthened legislature that can function as an effective check on the executive as well as an active, vigorous partner in the making of public policy. The singular nature of the office of the chief executive and his responsibility of managing the machinery of government have however, been argued to give him the opportunities and competitive advantage over the legislature and hence continues to exert executive dominance which most a times are seen as the result of conflicts between these two all-important arms of government (Eme & Ogbochie, 2014; Ariye, Ogbomah, Ebipre & Eric, 2012).
Many scholars and researchers on the home front like Olaoye (2014), Igbokwe-Ibeto & Anazodo (2015) and Obidimma & Obidimma (2015) have at different times carried out studies on legislative-executive relations and its bearing on governance in Nigeria; but none of these studies have attempted to address legislative-executive conflicts on democratic governance in Nigeria’s fourth republic vis-à-vis budgeting process, political stability, socio-economic development, service delivery, policy making and implementation. Hence, this research is being carried out to appraise the effects of legislative-executive conflicts on democratic governance in Nigeria’s fourth republic with some special references to Lagos State.
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The aim of this study is to examine the effects of legislative-executive conflicts on democratic governance in Nigeria’s fourth republic with some special references to Lagos State. Following this goal, the specific objectives are to:
1) To examine the effects of legislative-executive feud on political stability in Lagos State.
2) To explore the effect of legislative-Executive rivalry on budgeting process in Lagos State.
3) To investigate the relationship between legislative-executive face off and service delivery.
4) To examine the implications of legislative-executive conflicts on economic development in Nigeria.
1.4 Research Questions
The questions that this study seeks to address are:
1) Will legislative-executive feud have effect on political stability in Lagos State?
2) Is legislative-executive rivalry related to budgeting process in Lagos State?
3) To what extent does legislative-executive conflict affect service delivery in Lagos State?
4) Will legislative-executive conflicts have any effect on economic development in Nigeria?
1.5 Research Hypotheses
The researcher tends to test the following hypotheses in the course of the study;
Hypothesis One
Ho: There is no significant relationship between Legislative-Executive feud and political stability in Lagos State.
Hi: There is a significant relationship between Legislative-Executive feud and political stability in Lagos State.
Hypothesis Two
Ho: Legislative-Executive rivalry is not related to budgeting process.
Hi: Legislative-Executive rivalry is related to budgeting process.
Hypothesis Three
Ho: There is no significant relationship between legislative-executive conflicts and service delivery.
Hi: There is a significant relationship between legislative-executive conflicts and service delivery.
Hypothesis Four
Ho: There is no significant relationship between legislative-executive conflicts and economic development in Nigeria.
Hi: There is a significant relationship between legislative-executive conflicts and economic development in Nigeria.
Tags: Legislative executive conflicts Effects of legislative executive conflicts Evaluation of legislative executive conflicts Democratic governance Optimization of democratic governance
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
Delivery: Within 24 hours
Advertise Here
Not what you were looking for? Perform a search
What's your project topic?
Comment on Facebook:
Related Project Materials
- 1.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF YOUTH UNEMPLOYMENT ON THE ESCALATION OF CRIME RATES IN CAMEROON
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study Youth unemployment is a widespread issue that affects countries around the world, particularly th...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 809 engagements |
- 2.
EVALUATING THE COPING STRATEGIES UTILIZED BY UNEMPLOYED YOUTHS IN CAMEROON
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study Young people hold a significant position in any society. They are among the most valuable resourc...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 587 engagements |
- 3.
EVALUATING THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE INFORMAL SECTOR IN ALLEVIATING UNEMPLOYMENT IN CAMEROON
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study The global population includes about 1.2 billion individuals between the ages of 15 and 24. Appro...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 601 engagements |
- 4.
CIVIL SERVANT PERCEPTION OF THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF OFFICE POLITICS IN PUBLIC SERVICE OF CAME...
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Background of the Study Naturally, politics is an integral aspect of human existence and perceived by many as an inevitable a...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 735 engagements |
- 5.
ASSESSMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE ON FIRE DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AMONG TRADERS IN LAGOS ISLAND MARKET, LA...
ASSESSMENT OF THE KNOWLEDGE ON FIRE DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AMONG TRADERS IN LAGOS ISLAND MARKET, LAGOS STATE CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Backgro...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 599 engagements |
- 6.
ASSESSMENT OF URBAN UNEMPLOYMENT AS A DETERMINANT OF POLITICAL UNREST IN DOUALA, CAMEROON
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the study In today's world, the issue of unemployment has become increasingly prominent and is a growing co...More »
Item Type: Project Material | 54 pages | 517 engagements |