Existing studies have established that the physical characteristics of buildings have significant influence on occupants’ satisfaction. However, studies has shown that the conventional ways that public hospital buildings in Nigeria are designed have contributed to stress, depression and anxieties because of loss of privacy, control over eating and sleeping times, and noise. And in addition contributed to dangers, allergies and other acquired infections called Hospital Acquired Infections (HAI) to patients and staff. This study assessed the performance of Primary Healthcare Centre (PHC) buildings which is identified to be the appropriate settings to tackle over 90% of the major causes of morbidity and mortality due to its proximity to about two-thirds of Nigerians. The objectives of this study were to; identify those standard performance criteria of healthcare buildings that aids healing of patients and positively influence users of PHC buildings; evaluate the perception of users on the performance of PHC buildings and outline appropriate steps to remedy the identified gaps to match up with the global standards. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in six PHC buildings across the six area councils of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria. A purposive sampling technique was used to select a total of 334 samples (patients, medical staff and visitors’) from the target population. Data were collected with the aid of an adapted version of - Achieving Excellence Design Evaluation Toolkit (AEDET) questionnaires. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to present simple mean, standard deviation and test for statistical significance of the results. Ten criterion, categorized into three criteria namely; functionality, build quality and impact were identified as the required standards for healthcare building performance. They aid in the healing of patients, improve the productivity of medical staff and attract patronage from visitors. The results show that users’ perception on the functionality and build quality of the PHC buildings which concerns the extent to which it facilitates or inhibits the activities of the medical staff who carry out the functions inside and around the building was poor. Also, the staff and patient environment which was addressed byimpact was assessed to be poor. In view of these, patients in PHC buildings do not have privacy during their stay for treatment and cannot be alone with others to have private discussions because of the multiple bed system that is currently run. The toilets, bathrooms and other facilities for the use of staff, patients and visitor are not befitting and dignified enough to attract patronage. The study recommends that the National Primary Healthcare
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (PHC) BUILDINGS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (PHC) BUILDINGS
Chapters 1–5 | ₦5,000
Download Complete Project NowABSTRACT
Development Agency’s (NPHCDA) Minimum Standards for Primary Healthcare and the Ward Minimum Healthcare Package upon which the design of PHC buildings in Nigeria is based should be updated and reviewed to reflect modern trends in healthcare architecture.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
A completed building with its facilities and services must be fit for the purpose. Meaning that it should be able to perform its functions in the manner that will ensure satisfaction to its occupants (Ilesanmi, 2010; Hinde, 2012). Although buildings are constructed for different purposes (housing, school, health, etc.), their performance either excellent or poor can be seen from the eyes of its users (Ilesanmi, 2010; Jiboye, 2012). The design quality of a building have been found to influence its functions (Haciric, 2008; Ibrahim, 2011; Jiboye, 2012). For example, a well-designed school has shown to improve the teaching and learning process of teachers and students thereby improved educational achievements (Khan and Kotharkar, 2012; Khalila, Kamaruzzamanb, Baharumb, and Husina, 2015). Also, a well-designed hospital has shown to help in quick patients’ recovery, have positive impact on medical staff and visitors (Abbas and Ghazali, 2010; Ibrahim, 2011; Dandajeh, 2011).
A number of reasons have been provided on why buildings perform poorly in meeting users’ needs and expectations. The major reason was lack of adequate knowledge of users’ changing needs and preferences by architects and other professionals who design, construct and maintain these buildings. And the panacea to improve the overall performance of buildings is to explore and understand users’ needs, expectations and aspirations through regular performance evaluation by means of Building Performance Evaluation (BPE) or Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) (Natasha & Abdul Hadi, 2008; Ibema, Opoko, Adeboye, and Amole, 2013).
This Project is for You If:
- You are writing your final year project for the first time and don't want to make costly mistakes
- This is your exact topic, or very close to what your supervisor gave you
- Your supervisor has rejected one or more chapters and you don't know what to fix
- You are stuck on Chapter 3 or data analysis and nothing is making sense
- Your deadline is close and you are still far behind
- You can't find enough materials anywhere for your topic
- My project supervisor is very strict and I don't want to have any problem with my project work — I need a well structured and referenced project
- I saw my school project requirement and I am confused on where or what to do
- Everyone in my class has submitted their project and I haven't even started yet
- My supervisor rejected my research methodology and I don't know what to do
- I thought my topic was simple and easy but on Chapter 2 I cannot find any material and my work is due for submission
- I have the content somehow but my references and bibliography are all over the place and I don't know how to arrange them properly
- I am combining school with work and I genuinely do not have the time to write everything from scratch — I just need something to work with
- My supervisor changed the topic I wanted and approved another one — I am confused on where to start from
- I am scared of submitting something that will be flagged for plagiarism — I need something original that I can use as a proper guide
- I have been browsing the internet for days looking for materials on this topic and I cannot find anything useful anywhere
- This is not my first time doing this project — I have carried it over before and I cannot afford to do it again
- I have written some chapters already but I am stuck midway and need to see how others handled the same topic
Here's everything you get with the complete project package:
✔Chapters 1–5 (Word & PDF)
✔Abstract & Table of Contents
✔References, Citation & Bibliography
✔Fully Editable Microsoft Word Format
✔Original, Plagiarism-Free Content
✔Instant Email Delivery
Complete package —₦10,000₦5,000
Price may return to ₦10,000 at any time.
See Our Conversations With Students on WhatsApp
Students sharing their experience after using our service
Urgent delivery confirmed
Screenshot unavailable
Payment received and project delivered
Screenshot unavailable
Quality work and a repeat order
Screenshot unavailable
Returning customer appreciation
Screenshot unavailable
Customer appreciation
Screenshot unavailable
What Other Students Are Saying
↩ View More ReviewsCan't find what you're looking for?
Search thousands of project topics across every department.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. All project materials on iProject are original, well-researched, and crafted to be plagiarism-free. They are intended as academic guides and reference materials.
You will receive the complete project in both Microsoft Word (.docx) and PDF formats, making it easy to edit and submit.
Delivery is instant. Once payment is confirmed, the material is sent directly to your email address. You can also download it immediately from the checkout page.
Absolutely. The Word format is fully editable, allowing you to modify the content, swap out case studies, and adapt the material to your specific research context.