Certification

Dedication

Acknowledgement

Table of Content

List of Tables

ABSTRACT

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the study

1.2 Statement of the problem

1.3 Objective of the study

1.4 Research question

1.5 Significance of the study

1.6 Scope of the study

1.7 Limitation of the study

1.8 Definition of terms

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 Conceptual framework

2.2 Theoretical Framework

CHAPTER THREE: LOCAL GOVERNMENT EDUCATION AUTHORITY AND PRIMARY EDUCATION

3.1 Introduction

3.2 Administration and Funding of Primary Education in Nigeria; Historical Perspective

3.3 Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC) and Local Government Council.

3.4 State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) and Local Government Council; The Correlation

3.5 Local Government Education Authority (LGEA) and Local Government Council: The Correlation

CHAPTER FOUR: PROBLEMS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTONOMY ON PRIMARY EDUCATION IN NIGERIA

4.1 Introduction

4.2 Local Government Autonomy

4.3 State Government interference in Local Government Administration

4.4 Challenges of Local Government on Primary Education in Nigeria

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1 Summary

5.2 Conclusion

5.3 Recommendation

References

ABSTRACT

The broad objective of this study is to examine the problems of local government autonomy and its implications in the effective management of Primary schools.The study adopted a qualitative descriptive approach. It implore one of the traditional methods of gathering information, i.e. the secondary sources of data. A sizeable percentage of secondary sources that is used came from published and unpublished works which include materials extracted from: Archives, Newspapers, discussions, Conference papers, Magazines, Internets, Books, and Articles in journals e.t.c. and was analyzed to make the topic under discuss meaningful. Findings from the study reveal that local government has contributed immensely to the functioning of primary education, both in mandatory and concurrent capacities with the state government but basically, The state government had hijacked the primary education from the local government with the instrumentality of UBEC, SUBEB, and LGEA, which are more accountable to the state government, but in the real sense of it local government accommodate the major expenses which include the salaries, allowances and benefits, pension, etc . However due to undue interference from State, lack of fiscal autonomy has incapacitated the Local Government from effective functioning and alienated grassroots people from enjoying social service delivery expected of Local Governments in Nigeria. The study therefore recommends that relationship between the tiers of government especially State-Local government should shift from master/ servant relationship to that of partners in progress in delivery concurrent functions particularly in primary education delivery. More so, Federal Government should increase the consolidated funds to primary education through UBEC from 2% to at least 5% so as for primary education to be accessible to all and be free indeed to all and sundry.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

In the world over, education has become an essential commodity that determines the level of development or growth of any nation. It has become services that require the involvement of both the private and public sectors. The involvement of governments in education cut across all levels i.e., the primary, secondary and tertiary education. Basically, in Nigeria, local government has constitutional responsibility in primary education, while the state and federal government also has their responsibilities to perform succinctly in all levels of education. The three tiers of governments in Nigeria, needs to adequately address the issue of infrastructure, enrolment, planning and finance of primary education in other to achieve the cardinal objectives of primary education (Igidi, 2009).

Over the years, local and state government has constituted the real actors in Nigeria primary education especially in public service delivery. This is not farfetched from the fact that primary education remains primordial for every citizen, and it must be accessible to every citizens and local government serves as veritable instrument to social and economic development of the people at the grassroots. The 1976 Local Government Reforms in Nigeria gave the three-tier of government the onus for provision and maintenance of primary education. Local government is a government that is formed at the local level. It is a form of community government, so community development is its primary responsibility.The United Nations Office for Public Administration defines Local Government as “a political subdivision of a nation or (in a federal system) State, which is constituted by law and has substantial control of Local affairs including the powers to impose taxes or to exact labour for prescribed purposes. The governing body of such an entity is elected. The 1976 local government reform defines it as “government at local level exercised through representative council established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas”. These powers should give the Council substantial control over local affairs as well as the staff and institutional and financial powers to initiate and direct the provision of services and to determine and implement projects so as to complement the activities of the State and Federal governments in their areas, and to ensure, through devolution of these functions to these councils and through the active participation of the people and their traditional institutions, that local initiative and response to local needs and conditions are maximized.

Howbeit, the present 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria also stipulated that the Local Government should also embark on the provision and maintenance of primary, adult and vocational education in relation with State government. This is one of the cardinal areas where the state governments relate with local governments in the areas of education as service delivery. Lack of coordination among these tiers of government on strategic planning and budgeting has constituted a complication which most of the time resulted to duplication of functions, especially in providing some amenities to primary schools. ESSPIN (2009) similarly reported that duplication of effort and funding, lack of consensus between the different actors in primary education has brought about the inefficiencies experiencing in the sector.

1.2 Statement of the problem

Fiscal autonomy in local governments is generally believed to be the best tool for effective and efficient service delivery in rural areas of federated countries like Nigeria. In other words, with adequate funding, due process and accountability (devoid of excessive control by higher authorities – federal and or state government), local governments stand to serve best in the provision of basic social amenities like portable water, electricity, education, health-care service, recreational facilities to their respective communities. Despite the fact that the constitution has delegated the above responsibilities to local governments, they have not been able to carry them out effectively due to intervention from other levels of government as stated by Anyanwu (2021). Lack of autonomy, inadequate planning, weak policy execution, insufficient revenue, corruption and mismanagement, a lack of adequate manpower, are all the challenges impeding local government efficiency in service delivery especially at primary education level. On the interference of State Government on Local affair, David (2019) opined that constitutionally, local government have responsibilities to discharge concerning primary education, but practically, it is State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) who manage schools through Local Government Education Authority (LGEA) with little or no consultation to local government council, regardless of their huge contributions to primary education in Nigeria hence the implication on primary education deepens. Although there are scattered literature on Fiscal autonomy and intergovernmental relation non has focused on how lack of autonomy affect local government administration on primary education which necessitated for the study.

1.3 Objective of the Study

The broad objective of this study is to examine the problems of local government autonomy and its implications in the effective management of Primary schools. Specifically, the study seeks:

1. To examine the role of local government at the grass root level.

2. To determine the essence of primary education.

3. To investigate the role of local government education authority in primary education.

4. To ascertain the challenges of Local Government on Primary Education in Nigeria.

1.4 Research Question

1. What is the role of local government at the grass root level?

2. What is the the essence of primary education ?

3. What is the role of local government education authority in primary education?

4. What are the challenges of Local Government autonomy on Primary Education in Nigeria?

1.5 Significance of the study

The study will be of immense significant to citizens, statement student and researchers of public administration. It will improve the citizens knowledge on the relationship among the different levels of government and institutions. It will enlighten the general public on the service delivery expected from the local government and empowers them to demand for accountability from the local government when the fail to perform as well as promote transparency at all levels of governance. It will enlighten statesmen and policy makers on the need to revisit the revenue sharing formula in a way that will enable the third tier to solve her many grass root problem especially that of primary education. The study will contribute to the general body of knowledge, giving opportunity for further research in this field as scholars in public administration will use it as reference material.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The scope of this study borders on the problems of local government autonomy and its implications in the effective management of Primary schools. The study will further discuss the role of local government education authority in primary education and how lack of fiscal autonomy incapacitate them from efficient service delivery in that area.

1. 7 Research Methodology

The study therefore adopts a qualitative descriptive approach. It implore one of the traditional methods of gathering information, i.e. the secondary sources of data. A sizeable percentage of secondary sources that is used came from published and unpublished works which include materials extracted from: Archives, Newspapers, discussions, Conference papers, Magazines, Internets, Books, and Articles in journals e.t.c. and was analyzed to make the topic under discuss meaningful.

1.8 Limitation of the study

During the course of the study challenges encountered were exclusively but not delimited to the following numerous. These are

 Financial constraint: Insufficient fund tends to impede the efficiency of the researcher in sourcing for the relevant materials, literature or information and in the process of data collection (internet, questionnaire and interview)

Time constraint: time factor pose another constraint since having to cope in this research which went simultaneously within the time schedule of other academic work making it impossible to undertake this study in large more representative skill.

1.9 Definition of terms

Local Government: This is the third tiers of government at the local or grassroot level. It is established by law to exercise specific functions within specific areas. It is a territorial community with non-sovereign power to regulate its own affairs.

Service Delivery: This has to do with the process of providing basic amenities as in infrastructure and infrastructural development above.

Fiscal Autonomy: This is a state of making local governance to have not only distinct territorial boundary, legal powers to do or achieve specific goal but also, most importantly, enjoy substantial autonomy in financial matters without excessive but complementary control by higher authority(ies). These include, owning of treasury, separate budgets, and accounts based on effective reliable income generation from within and outside its domain.