iProject

SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIALS IN AGGREGATE FRACTIONS OF CULTIVATED AND UNCULTIVATED SOILS OF SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA

๐Ÿ“„ Project Material๐Ÿ“‹ 70 pages๐Ÿ“š Chapters 1โ€“5๐Ÿ’พ MS-Word & PDF

Chapters 1โ€“5 ย |ย  โ‚ฆ5,000

Download Complete Project Now

SOIL ORGANIC CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIALS IN AGGREGATE FRACTIONS OF CULTIVATED AND UNCULTIVATED SOILS OF SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA

 

ABSTRACT
A study was carried out on soils sampled at 0-10, 10-20, and 20-30 cm depths from both
cultivated and uncultivated soils at four different locations (Awgu, Okigwe, Nsukka I, and
Nsukka II), to evaluate the potentials of various aggregate size fractions of varying soil textures
and depths to sequester carbon under different land uses. A 4 x 2 x 3 factorial experiment was
conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD). Factor A was location at four levels, while
factor B (land use) had two levels. Factor C (soil depth) comprised of three levels. Results
showed that in both land uses, soil texture varied with depth in each location and included clay,
loam, clay loam, sandy loam and sandy clay loam. Generally, all the soil properties varied with
soil depth across the locations and land uses. Land use significantly (P = 0.05) affected pH in
KCl, Ca2+, Al3+, CEC, 0.50-1.00 mm water stable aggregates (WSA), total soil nitrogen (TSN) in
1.00-2.00 mm WSA, and soil organic carbon (SOC) in 1.00-2.00 mm and < 0.25 mm WSA.
Cultivation at 0-30 cm depth significantly reduced SOC in 1.00-2.00 mm WSA by 19.30 %, and
TSN in 1.00-2.00 mm WSA by 2.50 %. Land use effects on SOC in WSA at 0-30 cm depth of
the various locations followed no consistent trend, except that SOC was higher in cultivated than
in uncultivated soils of Nsukka II location. The SOC pool significantly decreased with soil depth.
The SOC pool at 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, and 20-30 cm depths averaged 17.62, 16.40 and 13.05 Mg
C ha-1 respectively, in cultivated soils; and 19.59, 17.86 and 12.03 Mg C ha-1 respectively, in
uncultivated soils.

The SOC pool to the depth of 30 cm differed distinctly amongst the study sites
in both land uses; however, cultivation had no significant effect on SOC pool. The effect due to
soil texture on SOC pool indicated that C sequestration was significantly greater in clay loam >
clay > sandy loam > loam > sandy clay loam. In all, SOC pool was most secluded at 10-20 cm
depth, and least at 20-30 cm depth. Whereas SOC pool significantly correlated with dispersion
ratio (DR), aggregated silt and clay (ASC), water dispersible clay (WDC), microporosity (Pmi),
0.50-1.00 mm WSA, mean weight diameter (MWD), soil pH, K+, and C/N ratio in cultivated
soils; it correlated significantly with ASC, Na+, and CEC in uncultivated soils. Apart from Pmi,
whose variability was largely due to the effect of SOC that significantly predicted up to 76 %,
SOC significantly accounted between 34 % and 54 % of the variability in MWD, WDC, and
WSA classes of > 2.00 mm, 1.00-2.00 mm and 1.00-0.50 mm of the cultivated soils.

This Project is for You If:

Yes, This Is My Situation โ€” Send Me the Complete Material

Here's everything you get with the complete project package:

โœ”Chapters 1โ€“5 (Word & PDF)
โœ”Abstract & Table of Contents
โœ”References, Citation & Bibliography
โœ”Fully Editable Microsoft Word Format
โœ”Original, Plagiarism-Free Content
โœ”Instant Email Delivery
Complete package โ€”โ‚ฆ10,000โ‚ฆ5,000
Price may return to โ‚ฆ10,000 at any time.

See Our Conversations With Students on WhatsApp

Students sharing their experience after using our service

Urgent delivery confirmed
Urgent delivery confirmed
Payment received and project delivered
Payment received and project delivered
Quality work and a repeat order
Quality work and a repeat order
Returning customer appreciation
Returning customer appreciation
Customer appreciation
Customer appreciation
Iโ€™ve Seen Enough โ€” Get Me This Project Material

What Other Students Are Saying

โ€œThe process was actually fine and I got my project quickly. The only thing I didn't really like was that I would have preferred they sent it via WhatsApp instead of email, because email took a bit of checking on my side. But once I got it, everything was already complete and I just edited small parts before submitting.โ€
Zina
Kenpoly
โ€œMy supervisor rejected my Chapter 1 and 2 and I was honestly lost. I got a material here and it already had everything arranged properly. I just adjusted it to my topic and resubmitted. The difference was clear immediately.โ€
Favour
Nekede
โ€œMy supervisor almost finished me ๐Ÿ˜ญ He rejected everything and said I didn't understand basics. I downloaded something here, used it to restructure my work, and resubmitted. That was how I escaped serious stress.โ€
Nnamdi
Absu

Can't find what you're looking for?

Search thousands of project topics across every department.

Related Project Materials

See More Agriculture Final Year Research Project Topics & Materials ยป

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this project original and plagiarism-free?
Yes. All project materials on iProject are original, well-researched, and crafted to be plagiarism-free. They are intended as academic guides and reference materials.
What format will I receive the material in?
You will receive the complete project in both Microsoft Word (.docx) and PDF formats, making it easy to edit and submit.
How soon will I get it after payment?
Delivery is instant. Once payment is confirmed, the material is sent directly to your email address. You can also download it immediately from the checkout page.
Can I edit the content to fit my own case study?
Absolutely. The Word format is fully editable, allowing you to modify the content, swap out case studies, and adapt the material to your specific research context.
All My Questions Are Answered โ€” Download the Complete Project
Message us