iProject

CHARACTERIZATION AND MAPPING OF GULLY EROSION FEATURES IN TWO GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS OF EASTERN NIGERIA USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM

๐Ÿ“„ Project Material๐Ÿ“‹ 58 pages๐Ÿ“š Chapters 1โ€“5๐Ÿ’พ MS-Word & PDF

Chapters 1โ€“5 ย |ย  โ‚ฆ5,000

Get Complete Project Material Now
 

CHARACTERIZATION AND MAPPING OF GULLY EROSION FEATURES IN TWO GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS OF EASTERN NIGERIA USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM

 

ABSTRACT
With the aid of Global Positioning System (GPS) and Satellite Aerial Photo, a comparative
characterization and mapping of soil gully erosion features on two geological formations
were carried out in Nsukka area of eastern Nigeria. The two geological formations were
Ajali and Mamu formations. The study involved the use of base map created using a
Geographic Information System (GIS) (GPS Track Marker) and Satellite Photo downloaded
from the internet using the same GIS (GPS Track Marker). This aided the field work for
erosion site study and data collection. A total of seventy (70) erosion sites with an average
length of about 1606.5 meters, average width of about 64.2 meters and average depth of 8.6
meters were visited in Ajali formation. On the other hand, only nine with an average length
of about 484.2 meters, average width of about 6.5 meters and an average depth of about 3.7
meters were visited in Mamu. In Ajali formation, forty three new erosion sites were
identified to add to the twenty seven old sites while in Manu formation only five new sites
were identified to add to the four old sites. Three profile pits were dug in each formation to
represent the soils. They are sites of Ada (Mpt1), Agu-Orba (Mpt2) and Agu-Ekwegbe
(Mpt3) on Mamu Formation while Iheaka (Apt1), Ede-Oballa (Apt2) and Aku (Apt3) were
sites on Ajali Formation.

The soils from the pits were sampled and analyzed for some
physical and chemical properties. The properties were, colour, texture, soil reaction, organic
matter, exchangeable bases, total nitrogen and available phosphorus, exchangeable acidity,
cat ion exchange capacity, and aggregate stability. There was a significant difference in the
value of gully length and width while the depth was statistically the same. There was a
positive significant correlation between length and width (r = 0.409), depth and width (r =
0.862), but non significant correlation between length and depth (r = 0.188) in Mamu
Formation, while a positive and significant correlation was found between length and depth
(r = 0.635), length and width (r = 0.578), depth and width (r = 0.689) in Ajali formation.
The results of the soil percentage state of aggregation (PSA) and percentage aggregate
stability (PAS) was low at both soils. There was no significant difference between their
mean weight diameters (MWD). Their low MWD values (1.1mm) in the soil of Mamu
formation and 1.2mm in the soil of Ajali formation were indication that the soil were highly
susceptible to erosion. Both soils of the studied area have low silt content (8% in the soil of
Ajali and 5% in the soil of Mamu), but moderate to high fine sand values (18% in Ajali and
49% in Mamu). These could be one of the factors promoting the soil erodibility. At micro

This Project is for You If:

Yes, This Is My Situation โ€” Send Me the Complete Material

Here's everything you get with the complete project package:

โœ”Chapters 1โ€“5 (Word & PDF)
โœ”Abstract & Table of Contents
โœ”References, Citation & Bibliography
โœ”Fully Editable Microsoft Word Format
โœ”Original, Plagiarism-Free Content
โœ”Delivery Within 24 Hours
Complete package โ€”โ‚ฆ10,000โ‚ฆ5,000
Price may return to โ‚ฆ10,000 at any time.

See Our Conversations With Students on WhatsApp

Students sharing their experience after using our service

Urgent delivery confirmed
Urgent delivery confirmed
Payment received and project delivered
Payment received and project delivered
Quality work and a repeat order
Quality work and a repeat order
Returning customer appreciation
Returning customer appreciation
Customer appreciation
Customer appreciation
Iโ€™ve Seen Enough โ€” Get Me This Project Material

What Other Students Are Saying

โ€œThe process was actually fine and I got my project quickly. The only thing I didn't really like was that I would have preferred they sent it via WhatsApp instead of email, because email took a bit of checking on my side. But once I got it, everything was already complete and I just edited small parts before submitting.โ€
Zina
Kenpoly
โ€œMy supervisor rejected my Chapter 1 and 2 and I was honestly lost. I got a material here and it already had everything arranged properly. I just adjusted it to my topic and resubmitted. The difference was clear immediately.โ€
Favour
Nekede
โ€œMy supervisor almost finished me ๐Ÿ˜ญ He rejected everything and said I didn't understand basics. I downloaded something here, used it to restructure my work, and resubmitted. That was how I escaped serious stress.โ€
Nnamdi
Absu

Can't find what you're looking for?

Search thousands of project topics across every department.

Related Project Materials

See More Agriculture Final Year Research Project Topics & Materials ยป

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this project original and plagiarism-free?
Yes. All project materials on iProject are original, well-researched, and crafted to be plagiarism-free. They are intended as academic guides and reference materials.
What format will I receive the material in?
You will receive the complete project in both Microsoft Word (.docx) and PDF formats, making it easy to edit and submit.
How soon will I get it after payment?
Once payment is confirmed, the material is delivered within 24 hours to the email address supplied at checkout.
Can I edit the content to fit my own case study?
Absolutely. The Word format is fully editable, allowing you to modify the content, swap out case studies, and adapt the material to your specific research context.
All My Questions Are Answered โ€” Download the Complete Project
Message us