ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF METHANOL EXTRACT AND FRACTIONS OF MORINGA OLEIFERA LAM. ROOT BARK ON CLINICAL ISOLATES OF METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS

📄 Item Type: Project Material| 📋 65 pages| 📚 1–5 chapters| Amount: ₦5,000

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF METHANOL EXTRACT AND FRACTIONS OF MORINGA OLEIFERA LAM. ROOT BARK ON CLINICAL ISOLATES OF METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS

📄 Project Material 📋 65 pages 📚 Chapters 1–5 💾 MS-Word & PDF

Chapters 1–5  |  ₦5,000

Get Complete Project Material Now

ABSTRACT

Development of antimicrobial resistance by bacteria is now a world wide health issue, as infection is one of the leading causes of death in the world today. This fact is also as a result of the emergence of multiple antibiotic resistant bacteria known as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) with potential of cross resistance to other antibiotics of

choice like vancomycin. MRSA is often referred to as a potential killer and one of the tree top superbugs in hospitals multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO). The aim of this study was to evaluate the phytochemical components and antimicrobial activity of methanol extract and fractions of Moringa oleifera root bark as possible remedy for MRSA infections.

Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 3 different hospitals in South-east geopolitical region of Nigeria were confirmed by coagulase/staphylase test using Oxoid® reagents kits (DR0595A). The characterised S. aureus isolates were further identified as Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus by disc diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), using standard antibiotic discs containing oxacillin (5 μg/ml), vancomycin (30 μg/ml), cephalexin (30 μg/ml), levofloxacin (5 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin (5 μg/ml), tetracycline (30 μg/ml), cotrimoxazole (25 μg/ml), gentamicin (30 μg/ml), clindamycin (2 μg/ml) and rifampicin (5 μg/ml). Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus

confirmation was done using Oxoid® DR0900 penicillin binding protein (pbp2ˈ) latex agglutination test kits. Pulverised Moringa oleifera root bark was defatted with n-hexane to yield hexane fraction (HEF). The dried marc was extracted with methanol using Soxhlet extractor to obtain crude methanol extract (ME). Methanol extract was adsorbed on Silical gel (60-200 mesh) and eluted in succession to obtain dichloromethane fraction (DMF), ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) and methanol fraction (MEF). Qualitative phytochemical analyses of the extracts were carried out using standard procedures. The antimicrobial activities of ME, HEF, DMF, EAF and MEF were evaluated on the MRSA, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were recorded and compared with the standard disc antimicrobial test results. The extract fractions were analysed using gas chromatographic-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for their bioactive compounds. The preliminary acute toxicity and sub-acute toxicity of ME and HEF were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done with ANOVA followed by Duncan post Hoc test using SPSS v 17 software. Characterised clinical isolates yielded 58 S. aureus strains. Antibiotic susceptibility tests indicated varied percentages of MRSA that were resistant to various antibiotics thus: oxacillin (62.1 ± 3.2%), vancomycin (60.4 ± 3.8%), cephalexin (55.2 ± 1.2%), levofloxacin (56.9 ±

2.2%), ciprofloxacin (56.9 ± 0.9%), tetracycline (65.5 ± 2.3%), cotrimoxazole (68.9 ± 0.8%), gentamicin (67.2 ± 1.3%), clindamycin (62.1 ± 3.3%) and rifampicin (62.1 ± 4.1%). Latex agglutination test confirmed 39 strains of the clinical isolates to be MRSA. The S. aureus isolates resistant to all the antibiotics including vancomycin at 30 μg/ml were sensitive to the

extract and all its fractions: ME: MIC (3.0 ± 0.1 to 5.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml) and MBC (3.0 ± 0.1 to 6.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml); EAF: MIC (5.0 ± 1.1 to 8.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml) and MBC (5.0 ± 0.5 to 8.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml); DMF MIC (8.0 ± 1.1 to 10 ± 0.5 mg/ml) and MBC (8.0 ± 0.5 to 10 ± 0.5 mg/ml); HEF: MIC (7.0 ± 0.5 to 8 ± 1.1 mg/ml) and MBC (7.0 ± 0.5 to 9 ± 0.5 mg/ml), MEF: MIC (9.0 ± 1.1 to 10.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml) and MBC (9.0 ± 0.5 to 10.0 ± 0.5 mg/ml).

Phytochemical analysis of the extracts showed the presence of alkaloids, glycosides, steroids, terpenoids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, resins, reducing sugars, proteins, fats and oil and carbohydrates. GC-MS analysis revealed over 100 distinct compounds, some of which are stigmasterol (C29H48O), eugenol (C10H12O2), oxime (C3H7NO ) and ergosta-4, 22-dien-3-one (C28H44O). The oral acute toxicity test showed the LD50 of ME as 3663.96 mg/kg and HEF as 1934.15mg/kg, with no significant change (P > 0.05) in the hematological, serum biochemical parameters and weight of the rats.

This Project is for You If:

  • You are writing your final year project for the first time and don't want to make costly mistakes
  • This is your exact topic, or very close to what your supervisor gave you
  • Your supervisor has rejected one or more chapters and you don't know what to fix
  • You are stuck on Chapter 3 or data analysis and nothing is making sense
  • Your deadline is close and you are still far behind
  • You can't find enough materials anywhere for your topic
  • My project supervisor is very strict and I don't want to have any problem with my project work — I need a well structured and referenced project
  • I saw my school project requirement and I am confused on where or what to do
  • Everyone in my class has submitted their project and I haven't even started yet
  • My supervisor rejected my research methodology and I don't know what to do
  • I thought my topic was simple and easy but on Chapter 2 I cannot find any material and my work is due for submission
  • I have the content somehow but my references and bibliography are all over the place and I don't know how to arrange them properly
  • I am combining school with work and I genuinely do not have the time to write everything from scratch — I just need something to work with
  • My supervisor changed the topic I wanted and approved another one — I am confused on where to start from
  • I am scared of submitting something that will be flagged for plagiarism — I need something original that I can use as a proper guide
  • I have been browsing the internet for days looking for materials on this topic and I cannot find anything useful anywhere
  • This is not my first time doing this project — I have carried it over before and I cannot afford to do it again
  • I have written some chapters already but I am stuck midway and need to see how others handled the same topic
Yes, This Is My Situation — Send Me the Complete Material

Here's everything you get with the complete project package:

Chapters 1–5 (Word & PDF)
Abstract & Table of Contents
References, Citation & Bibliography
Fully Editable Microsoft Word Format
Original, Plagiarism-Free Content
Delivery Within 24 Hours
Complete package ₦10,000₦5,000
Price may return to ₦10,000 at any time.

See Our Conversations With Students on WhatsApp

Students sharing their experience after using our service

I've Seen Enough — Get Me This Project Material

What Other Students Are Saying

↩ View More Reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Search thousands of project topics across every department.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. All project materials on iProject are original, well-researched, and crafted to be plagiarism-free. They are intended as academic guides and reference materials.
You will receive the complete project in both Microsoft Word (.docx) and PDF formats, making it easy to edit and submit.
Once payment is confirmed, the material is delivered within 24 hours to the email address supplied at checkout.
Absolutely. The Word format is fully editable, allowing you to modify the content, swap out case studies, and adapt the material to your specific research context.
All My Questions Are Answered — Download the Complete Project